COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTIMICROBIAL AND FUNGICIDAL ACTIVITY OF COMMONLY AVAILABLE HAND SANITIZERS AND ANTIBACTERIAL WET WIPES ON UKRAINIAN MARKET

Keywords: Hand sanitizer, antiseptic, wet wipes, hand microbiome, antimicrobial activity, hand hygiene

Abstract

Introduction. Hand sanitizers and antibacterial wet wipes usage are one of the essential (after hand washing) preventive methods for fecal-oral, and airborne transmitted infections, COVID-19 in particular. WHO and MoH of Ukraine recommend regular use of hand sanitizers during the world pandemic. Nevertheless, in Ukraine, unlike European Union countries, takes place the lack of legislative framework, which should ensure effective control of commonly available antiseptic products antibacterial or antiviral activity.  On the contrary, during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, MOH of Ukraine has simplified the registration procedures for the new disinfectants, which raises the chance of ineffective antiseptics appearance due to its growing demand.

Objectives. The research aimed to test the antibacterial and antifungal activity of commonly available Ukrainian hand sanitizers and antibacterial wipes.

Methods. Thirty-six samples were tested, among them 19 (52.8%) antibacterial wet wipes and 17 (47.2%) hand sanitizers, which include 5 (13.9%) gel antiseptics and 12 (33.3%) spray antiseptics.

Sample names were next: 

  • Wet wipes: «Naturelle», «Smile with alcohol», «Smile baby», «Smile with D-panthenol», «Smile with plantago juice», «Viva Fruts», «Zeffir», «Hliantz», «Chicolino», «Green Way», «Lili», «Novax», «Ozon», «Ruta», «Superfresh», «Supero», «Dobryi Dotyk», «Snizhna Panda», «Siela»;  
  • Gel antiseptics: «Vital Charm», «Wash Your Body», «Doctor Biokon», «Manorm», «Aromat»
  • Spray antiseptics: «Altamed», «Colour intense», «Pro Ecolek», «Green Way», «Lucky Day», «Manorm», «Wash Your Body», «Antyseptychna ridyna», «Argenvit», «Aniospray», «Sribna Voda», «Tsilytel’»

For antibacterial and antifungal activity observation agar well diffusion method was used, with testing on the following reference cultures and clinical isolates of microorganisms (from patients with nosocomial infections): Escherichia coli АТСС 25922; Staphylococcus aureus АТСС 26923 (F-49); Candida albicans АТСС 885/653;  Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (F-51, Escherichia coli №5; Candida albicans №60; Candida non-albicans №67; Raoultella terrigena №1; Staphylococcus lentus № 19; Brevundimonas vesicularis №111; Citrobacter sedlakii №37; Pseudomonas aeruginosa №13; Enterococcus spp. №161; Aerococcus viridans №26.

ResultsAmong the specimens studied, 36.1% (n=13) did not have required antimicrobial activity. From gel antiseptics samples 60.0% (n=3) were partially or completely inactive, from spray antiseptics – 50.0% (n=6). So, every second hand sanitizer can not be used for infectious diseases spreading prevention. Among the wet wipes samples 21.0% (n=4) have shown insufficient antimicrobial activity.

Conclusions. Proper handwashing with correct technique usage remains one of the most crucial methods for fecal-oral, and airborne transmitted diseases prevention. Including the research results, it is better to use hand sanitizers, and antibacterial wet wipes produced by well-known brands and bought in pharmacies, with preference to alcohol-based gel antiseptics, as the efficacy of active ones was the highest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Hand Hygiene: Why, How & When? World Heal Organ [Internet]. 2009;(August):1-7. Available from: https://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Hand_Hygiene_Why_How_and_When_Brochure.pdf

Organization WH. How to Handrub & How to Handwash. 2008;(October):2006. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:How+to+handrub+?+How+to+handwash+?#2

Nicolaides C, Avraam D, Cueto‐Felgueroso L, González MC, Juanes R. Hand‐Hygiene Mitigation Strategies Against Global Disease Spreading through the Air Transportation Network. Risk Anal [Internet]. 2019 Dec 23;risa.13438. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/risa.13438 https://doi.org/10.1101/530618

MOZ Ukraiiny. Rekomendatsii dlia hromadian shchodo koronavirusu 2019-nCoV [Internet]. [cited 2001 Sep 20]. p. 1. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/rekomendacii-dlja-gromadjan-schodo-koronavirusu-2019-ncov

Pittet D. Hand Hygiene in Health Care First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care is Safer Care. World Health [Internet]. 2009;30(1):270. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf https://doi.org/10.1086/600379

World Health Organization. Guide To Local Production: Who-Recommended Handrub Formulations. 2015;(April):1-9.

Gold NA, Avva U. Alcohol Sanitizer [Internet]. StatPearls. 2020. 1-6 p. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30020626

Jain VM, Karibasappa GN, Dodamani AS, Prashanth VK, Mali GV. Comparative assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of different hand sanitizers: An in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016;13(5):424-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.192283

Madan K, Prashar N, Thakral S. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of alcoholic vs non-alcoholic hand sanitizers. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol an Pharma Res. 2012;1(4):173-7.

Wang Z, Lapinski M, Quilliam E, Jaykus LA, Fraser A. The effect of hand-hygiene interventions on infectious disease-associated absenteeism in elementary schools: A systematic literature review. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(6):682-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.01.018

Hammond B, Ali Y, Fendler E, Dolan M, Donovan S. Effect of hand sanitizer use on elementary school absenteeism. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(5):340-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2000.107276

Hilburn J, Hammond BS, Fendler EJ, Groziak PA. Use of alcohol hand sanitizer as an infection control strategy in an acute care facility. Am J Infect Control. 2003;31(2):109-16. https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2003.15

Blaney DD, Daly ER, Kirkland KB, Tongren JE, Kelso PT, Talbot EA. Use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers as a risk factor for norovirus outbreaks in long-term care facilities in northern New England: December 2006 to March 2007. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(4):296-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.010

Oughton MT, Loo VG, Dendukuri N, Fenn S, Libman MD. Hand Hygiene with Soap and Water Is Superior to Alcohol Rub and Antiseptic Wipes for Removal of Clostridium difficile . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(10):939-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/605322

CDC. When and How to Wash Your Hands [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/when-how-handwashing.html

Pickering AJ, Davis J, Boehm AB. Efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizer on hands soiled with dirt and cooking oil. J Water Health. 2011;9(3):429-33. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2011.138

Voller LM, Schlarbaum JP, Hylwa SA. Allergenic Ingredients in Health Care Hand Sanitizers in the United States. Dermatitis. 2020;0000000000:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000567

Aschenbeck KA, Warshaw EM. Allergenic Ingredients in Personal Hygiene Wet Wipes. Dermatitis. 2017;28(5):317-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000275

CDC. Show Me the Science - When & How to Use Hand Sanitizer in Community Settings [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/show-me-the-science-hand-sanitizer.html

Kabinet Ministriv Ukraiiny. Pro poriadok derzhavnoii rejestratsii (pererejestratsii) desinfektsijnyh zasobiv: postaniva Kabinetu Ministriv Ukraiiny vid 3 lypnia 2006r. №908 [Internet]. p. 2006.-№ 27-ст. 1949; 2018.-№ 25-ст. 90. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/908-2006-п

Kabinet Ministriv Ukraiiny. Zakon Ukraiiny Pro zabezpechennia sanitarnoho ta epidemichnoho blahopoluchchia naselennia [Internet]. p. 1994.-№ 27.-ст.218. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4004-12

Ahmed K, Ahmed H, Ahmed FA, Ali AA, Akbar J, Rana J, et al. Analysis of anti-microbial and anti-biofilm activity of hand washes and sanitizers against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(1):100-4. https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.2776

Ochwoto M, Muita L, Talaam K, Wanjala C, Ogeto F, Wachira F, et al. Anti-bacterial efficacy of alcoholic hand rubs in the Kenyan market, 2015. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control . 2017;6(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0174-3

Guidance E. Performance criteria Overview of (EN) standards , test conditions , and pass criteria. 2017;1(March).

Moorer WR. Antiviral activity of alcohol for surface disinfection. Int J Dent Hyg. 2003;1(3):138-42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00032.x

van Engelenburg FAC, Terpstra FG, Schuitemaker H, Moorer WR. The virucidal spectrum of a high concentration alcohol mixture. J Hosp Infect. 2002;51(2):121-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2002.1211


Abstract views: 218
PDF Downloads: 9
Published
2020-04-14
How to Cite
1.
Lekhniuk N, Mykytiuk S, Konechna R, Shykula R, Korniychuk O, Konechnyi Y. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTIMICROBIAL AND FUNGICIDAL ACTIVITY OF COMMONLY AVAILABLE HAND SANITIZERS AND ANTIBACTERIAL WET WIPES ON UKRAINIAN MARKET. Proc Shevchenko Sci Soc Med Sci [Internet]. 2020Apr.14 [cited 2020Jun.5];59(1). Available from: https://mspsss.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/276